In reply to:
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
@AndrewYang
·
130d
The statement addresses a public issue related to the accessibility of NFL games, which is a matter of public concern. The tone is straightforward and the intent is to argue for greater accessibility of sports broadcasts to the general public without the need for additional streaming services.
- The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. It is a critique of a policy rather than an attack on individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting a common frustration among viewers who may not want to subscribe to additional services. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a policy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to advocate for a change that could benefit society by making sports more accessible. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.