Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
507d
The statement 'The truth libs don’t want to hear' and the subsequent conversation between @DrJillStein and @AOC about the Green Party and the two-party system constitute public discourse as they engage with public issues and debates about political systems and party authenticity.
- The statement 'The truth libs don’t want to hear' has a confrontational tone that could be seen as harmful, as it frames the discussion in an antagonistic manner. This could potentially escalate tensions rather than foster constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but the use of 'libs' can be seen as dismissive and disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it sets up an 'us vs. them' dynamic. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement 'The truth libs don’t want to hear' can be seen as a personal attack on a group rather than engaging in constructive criticism. However, @DrJillStein's call for a debate is a more constructive approach.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible due to its confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.