The statement questions the absence of public comments from Kamala Harris and Tim Walz regarding an American citizen allegedly executed by the Israeli regime. The tone is accusatory and demands accountability from public figures.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a confrontational tone that could escalate tensions.Ā [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does call out specific individuals publicly, which could be seen as a form of pressure.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on demanding accountability.Ā [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a confrontational approach and could be seen as a personal attack.Ā [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to demand accountability from public figures, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by seeking justice.Ā [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles but could be more responsible and constructive in its approach.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.