Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
506d
The statement involves a public figure (Dr. Jill Stein) addressing another public figure (AOC) on a public issue (the two-party system and the Green Party). It engages in public discourse by discussing political dynamics and inviting a debate on a substantive issue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the use of 'verbal MMA slapdown' could be seen as aggressive and potentially harmful in tone. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use a confrontational tone which could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement invites a debate, which could promote understanding, but the aggressive tone may undermine empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites constructive dialogue but also includes a personal attack by calling out AOC's comments as 'DNC talking points', which could be seen as an ad hominem argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in a public issue, but the tone could be more responsible and respectful. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.