In reply to:
Not Selina Meyer
@Shituation_Room
·
184d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
184d
The statement 'No 14 year old should be given an AR-15. It's absurd.' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning gun control and the appropriateness of providing firearms to minors. The tone is assertive and critical, aiming to challenge the notion that it is acceptable for a 14-year-old to possess an AR-15.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating against giving a potentially dangerous weapon to a minor, which aligns with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the absurdity of giving a minor such a weapon, which could lead to harmful consequences. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it focuses on the issue rather than attacking individuals. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a safer society by opposing the idea of minors having access to AR-15s. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a significant public concern. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.