Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
506d
The statement 'Jill has been wailing on AOC for days & im here for it' refers to a public conversation involving Dr. Jill Stein and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) about political authenticity and the two-party system. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and debates about political parties and their roles in society.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the phrase 'wailing on' suggests a combative tone, which could be seen as promoting conflict rather than constructive dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of AOC by framing the interaction as a one-sided attack. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to celebrate conflict. Significant violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It frames the interaction as a personal attack rather than a substantive debate. Significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly. It uses a platform to promote a combative narrative rather than fostering a respectful and constructive public discourse. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.