Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
506d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the critique of political figures and the two-party system in the United States.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply a negative comparison to Western politicians, which could be seen as a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a broad negative generalization about Western politicians, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it sets up a dichotomy between the praised individual and Western politicians. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad negative comparison without specific evidence or constructive suggestions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could be seen as not using the platform responsibly due to its broad negative generalization.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.