Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 112

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), specifically the distinction between interpolation and extrapolation. This is a significant topic within the field of AI and has broader implications for technology and society.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a professional and academic response. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by referencing empirical evidence and academic work, which can foster a more informed discussion. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting a review of empirical evidence and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not explicitly acknowledge or correct any mistakes, but it does not appear to contain any errors that need correction.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the influence of the author to promote a more informed and evidence-based discussion, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by focusing on empirical evidence and academic discourse. [+1]