Vivek Ramaswamy

The statement 'Yes.' in response to a question about whether Trump will 'Free Ross' (presumably referring to Ross Ulbricht, the founder of Silk Road) constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to criminal justice and presidential pardons. The statement is brief and lacks substantive content, but it does participate in a broader civic dialogue.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is neutral and simply affirms a possibility.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is neutral and does not provide any context or reasoning.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a simple affirmation without any argument or personal attack.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society. It is neutral and does not provide any substantive contribution to the issue.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly. It does not misuse the platform or spread misinformation. [+1]