In reply to:
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages substantively with public issues related to AI, healthcare, and drug discovery. The tone is measured and aims to provide a balanced perspective on the contributions of Google DeepMind in the field of biology and healthcare.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing a balanced view and acknowledging the contributions of Google DeepMind, thus avoiding any harmful rhetoric. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the impact of AlphaFold and setting realistic expectations about the challenges of curing diseases like cancer. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the concerns raised by @bindureddy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to provide a nuanced perspective on a complex issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.