Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 114
9/8/2024, 3:13:48 AM
X
In reply to:
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
313d
@GaryMarcus @FairmountJack @Rahll Yes but did you read the actual content of what I said at all because your reply with an article about copyright violation makes no sense in context
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
313d
@edzitron @FairmountJack @Rahll Violating copyrights was part of it no?
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
313d
@GaryMarcus @FairmountJack @Rahll Not what I was talking about
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
313d
@edzitron @FairmountJack See also https://spectrum.ieee.org/midjou… with @rahll and myself
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
313d
@FairmountJack I have already generated at least 40 pictures, each violating multiple copyrights, and a picture of Garfield with big honkers. I shall be a burden on the system itself
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
313d
@FairmountJack Been using it to get to DM people I need to for the show and annoyed about it. Intend to generate enough images on grok to make it unprofitable and will spend - and itemise - spending any creator fund money on one of many burger meals and the rest to the trevor project

The statement and the accompanying image engage in a discussion about the use of artificial intelligence for generating images, touching on issues of copyright violation and the ethical implications of AI-generated content. The tone is humorous and somewhat satirical, particularly in the context of the image and the exaggerated description of the generated content. The statement also indirectly critiques the allocation of resources for AI development by referencing Elon Musk and the use of GPUs.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the humorous tone might be seen as trivializing the serious issue of copyright infringement.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement uses humor to promote understanding and empathy about the absurdity of certain AI applications, but it could be seen as not taking the issue of copyright violation seriously enough.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism through satire, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to highlight issues related to AI and copyright, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by bringing attention to these concerns. [+1]