Gary Marcus

The statement by @ianbremmer constitutes public discourse as it engages in a discussion about the appropriateness of a public figure's actions and their response to criticism, which is a matter of public concern.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does contribute to a critical discussion.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does call attention to another person's actions in a critical manner.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on pointing out a perceived flaw. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a perceived issue with the nonapology, but it could be seen as somewhat accusatory.
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on another person's actions.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a public issue responsibly. [+1]