In reply to:
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about expertise and credibility in the field of AI, specifically regarding large language models (LLMs) and transformer architectures. The tone of the statement is defensive and dismissive, aiming to assert the speaker's expertise and discredit the opposing viewpoint.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it includes a dismissive and derogatory term ('bullshit'), which can be seen as harmful and disrespectful. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in a personal attack rather than focusing on the substantive issues. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it dismisses the opposing viewpoint without providing constructive criticism or evidence. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to a personal attack and dismissive language rather than addressing the arguments presented. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.