Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
505d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the political landscape in the United States, specifically addressing the comparison between the US Green Party and major corporate capitalist parties. It critiques the perceived imbalance in funding, media access, and power, and highlights the influence of opponents in writing the rules. The tone is critical but not overtly hostile, and it aims to provoke thought and discussion about the political system.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of the political system rather than an attack on individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the disparities between political parties. However, it could be more empathetic and compassionate in its tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the political system and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss political issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.