Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
505d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the authenticity and challenges faced by a non-corporate funded political party, and it responds to a public figure's criticism. The tone is defensive and aims to challenge the critic's stance while promoting a debate on a significant public issue—the two-party system in the U.S.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as confrontational.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does call out a specific individual, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the struggles of a non-corporate funded party, but it could do more to foster compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites constructive dialogue by calling for a debate, but it also includes a personal attack by suggesting the critic is using 'DNC talking points.'Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to address a public issue responsibly, though the tone could be more respectful. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.