Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
505d
The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of electoral integrity and the actions of political parties. The tone is accusatory and suggests that the Democratic Party is undermining democracy by invalidating Green Party signatures. The statement 'Save democracy by sabotaging democracy. The ends justify the means!' implies a justification for unethical actions to achieve a perceived greater good, which is a contentious and provocative stance.
- The statement and image potentially cause harm by promoting a divisive and accusatory narrative, which can exacerbate political tensions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and image do not respect the dignity of the individuals depicted, as they are caricatured and mocked. This can be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and image do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, they foster division and animosity. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against political figures. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion but does so in a manner that may not contribute positively to societal betterment. It promotes a divisive and confrontational approach. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.