Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement introduces a substantive engagement with a significant public issue, namely the Middle East peace process. It mentions a conversation with notable public figures and a draft framework for a two-state solution, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement does not contain any harmful language or actions. It appears to be a neutral introduction to a discussion on a sensitive topic. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by involving key figures from both sides of the conflict in a dialogue about peace. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It sets the stage for constructive dialogue. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By addressing a significant public issue and involving influential figures, the statement uses its platform for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by focusing on a constructive and important public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.