Jill Stien

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -104

The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing political issues, specifically the endorsement of a controversial figure and the implications of war. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to provoke a reaction and highlight perceived hypocrisy or wrongdoing.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language and accusations that could be harmful to the individuals mentioned. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it labels a public figure as a 'war criminal' without a nuanced discussion. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism and condemnation. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion, but it does so in a way that may not be responsible or with integrity. [-1]