In reply to:
katrina k.n.
@kat4house
·
502d
The statement by @DrJillStein constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue—sex work decriminalization and related policies. The tone is respectful and aims to clarify the platform's stance while acknowledging the complexity of the issue.
- The statement strives to do no harm by promoting a policy that aims to protect sex workers, which aligns with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging that decriminalization and repeal are only starting points towards justice for sex workers. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a suggestion without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by advocating for policies aimed at justice for sex workers. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by providing a clear and respectful response. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.