In reply to:
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
503d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political endorsements, war, and campaign values. The tone is assertive and promotional, aiming to distinguish the campaign from others by emphasizing its anti-war and pro-worker stance. The statement also indirectly criticizes another political figure and their endorsements.
- The statement strives to do no harm by promoting anti-war and pro-worker values, but it indirectly criticizes another political figure, which could be seen as harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to some extent but refers to another political figure as a 'war criminal,' which could be seen as disrespectful and inflammatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy for anti-war and pro-worker values but does so in a confrontational manner.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes a strong negative assertion about another political figure. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to promote the betterment of society by advocating for anti-war and pro-worker values. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech but could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity due to its confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.