Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 72

The statement critiques the current state and future potential of large language models (LLMs) in AI, suggesting that their usefulness has been exaggerated and that they may face a significant downfall similar to AltaVista if no substantial improvements are made. The accompanying image provides historical context about AltaVista's impact on search engine optimization and its eventual decline due to manipulation issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but does offer a critical perspective on LLMs, which could be seen as a cautionary note for the industry. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the technology rather than individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By drawing a parallel with AltaVista, the statement encourages understanding of potential pitfalls in AI development, promoting a more cautious and informed approach. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of LLMs, suggesting that without significant advancements, they may face obsolescence. It does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to highlight potential issues in AI technology, aiming to contribute to the betterment of the field by urging for improvements. [+1]