In reply to:
Jackie Singh 🥥🌴
@HackingButLegal
·
292d
The statement by @HackingButLegal in response to @GaryMarcus and @HackingButLegal's conversation about LLM prompt surveillance constitutes public discourse. It engages with a public issue concerning privacy and the implications of large language models (LLMs). The tone is neutral and informative, aiming to share information and contribute to the ongoing discussion about the societal impacts of AI technologies.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. It is neutral and does not contain any harmful language or intent. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by sharing a link to a piece discussing an underdiscussed issue, thereby contributing to the public's knowledge and awareness. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing additional information relevant to the discussion without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful discussion about a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.