Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement involves a question posed by Piers Morgan to a Green Party presidential candidate, Jill Stein, regarding a hypothetical endorsement from Vladimir Putin. This question touches on public issues, specifically the implications of foreign endorsements in political campaigns, and thus constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a question aimed at eliciting a response on a public issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is a form of constructive dialogue, asking for the candidate's perspective on a relevant issue. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a public concern. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.