Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the political stance of the Democratic Party and its alleged support for genocide. The tone is accusatory and provocative, aiming to draw attention to a controversial topic and promote a specific viewpoint.
- The statement does harm by making a severe accusation without providing evidence within the statement itself, which can inflame tensions and spread misinformation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it accuses a political party of supporting genocide without substantiation, which can be seen as a form of defamation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it promotes division and hostility. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a sweeping accusation without engaging in a reasoned argument or providing evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it makes a serious accusation without substantiation, which can mislead the public and harm civic dialogue. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.