Jill Stien

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -104
Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
9/9/2024, 9:30:27 PM
X

The statement by @DrJillStein, 'The DNC Was 'Joy in the Face of Genocide'' along with a link to a YouTube video, constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically critiquing the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in a highly charged manner.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('genocide') which can be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially causing emotional distress or inciting anger. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others by making a severe accusation without context, which can be seen as a form of verbal aggression. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses provocative language that may polarize rather than foster constructive dialogue. This violates the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a strong accusation without providing evidence or context, which can be seen as a form of personal attack. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that can be considered irresponsible due to its inflammatory nature. This partially upholds the principle of free speech but violates the responsible use of the platform. [-1]