Gary Marcus

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about the nature of science, truth, and epistemology, which are significant public issues.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to intend harm, but the tone is confrontational and dismissive, which could be seen as harmful in a public debate. Minor violation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a focus on the argument rather than personal attacks. Adheres to the principle. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on refuting the other person's argument without fostering a constructive dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism but borders on a personal attack by dismissing the other person's argument as a form of nihilism. Minor violation. [-1]