In reply to:
Briahna Joy Gray
@briebriejoy
·
128d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the effectiveness of voting strategies in achieving political goals. The tone is critical but not hostile, and the intent is to discuss the strategic value of voting in primaries versus general elections.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of a political strategy rather than a personal attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of political strategy, which can be seen as fostering empathy and compassion for those who want to create change. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a political strategy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.