Brian Roemmele
@BrianRoemmele
·
197d
The statement 'Absolutists are always wrong' and the subsequent conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive debate about the nature of truth, science, and policy. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and humorous, but the intent is to critique and discuss the concept of absolutism in scientific and policy contexts.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism but also includes a personal attack ('bwahaha'). [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as using the platform irresponsibly due to the sarcastic tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.