Gary Marcus

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about absolutism and the nature of truth, which are substantive topics relevant to public discourse. The tone of the statement is somewhat critical and questioning, suggesting that the original poster finds the dogmatic stance of another participant to be excessive or contradictory. The intent appears to be to highlight perceived hypocrisy or inconsistency in the other participant's argument.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the critical tone could be seen as slightly confrontational.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a level of respect for the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on pointing out perceived inconsistencies.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the dogmatic stance of another participant. It does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]