Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement questions the plausibility of an unintentional shooting by a sniper and calls for justice and an independent investigation for Aysenur Ezgi Eygi. The tone is skeptical and demands accountability.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies skepticism about the IDF's explanation, which could be seen as challenging but not harmful. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of Aysenur by advocating for justice and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes empathy and compassion by calling for justice for Aysenur. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the IDF's explanation and calling for an independent investigation, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for justice and accountability, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to call for an independent investigation and justice. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.