Gary Marcus

Rank 32 of 47

Score -29

@gen0m1cs @jeremykauffman Are you are aware that these data and methods have not been peer reviewed per the author? and that the author says it is not appropriate to compare individual countries? And what you doing is considering misuse even by the author? And that the measures clearly conflate…

9/10/2024, 1:04:12 PM

In reply to:

evolian

@gen0m1cs

191d

@jeremykauffman The most up-to-date national database places Haiti at a little more than 72 w/an SE of about 6 points (Jensen & Kirkegaard, 2024).

I’m sure you aware of the estimate from Human Varieties based on that 1985 US-gov sponsored study, here are some other estimates as well.

Jeremy Kauffman 🦔

@jeremykauffman

191d

Haiti has an average IQ of 67. Let's talk about what that means:

- With an IQ of 67 or below, the average Haitian -- over half the country -- would be considered too disabled to be eligible for the death penalty. Someone at this level will struggle to understand the…

William Strannix

@GetRyback92

191d

Assuming people from a certain nation have a certain IQ is a sign of low intelligence.

The statement addresses the misuse of data and methods in a public discussion about national IQ scores, specifically pointing out that the data and methods have not been peer-reviewed and that comparing individual countries is inappropriate according to the author. The tone is critical and aims to correct misinformation.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by correcting potential misuse of data, which could lead to harmful stereotypes or misinformation. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by highlighting the inappropriate use of data rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by providing context about the limitations of the data and methods used. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the misuse of data without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]