The statement and the associated conversation involve a discussion on the use of IQ data to make generalizations about populations, which touches on sensitive issues of race, intelligence, and public policy. The tone of the statement is critical of the misuse of data and methods that have not been peer-reviewed and are not appropriate for comparing individual countries. The intent appears to be to highlight the problematic nature of using such data to make broad and potentially harmful generalizations.
- The statement strives to do no harm by pointing out the misuse of data and methods that could lead to harmful generalizations about populations. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by criticizing the misuse of data rather than attacking individuals or groups. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing information about the limitations and appropriate use of the data in question. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the misuse of data and methods rather than engaging in personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.