Gary Marcus

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -53
In reply to:

The statement engages in a critique of the methodological rigor of certain IQ studies, comparing them to previous works. It is part of a broader discussion on the validity and implications of IQ measurements, particularly in the context of national averages and their use in public discourse. The tone is critical but not overtly hostile, aiming to highlight perceived weaknesses in the newer studies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but engages in a critique of the methodology used in certain studies. It does not promote harmful actions or speech.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals by focusing on the methodological aspects of the studies rather than making personal attacks.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by pointing out methodological flaws, which can be seen as an attempt to improve the quality of discourse on the topic. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the studies' methodologies without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]