Matt Taibbi

Rank 35 of 47

Score -49

The Global Disinformation Index scandal uncovered by @gekaminsky has been overlooked because of partisan biases. If the Pentagon or State Department were paying agencies to downrank sites like Mother Jones or Salon, there would be widespread outrage.

Gabe Kaminsky

@gekaminsky

525d

New Heritage Foundation report shines light on @dcexaminer's series about the Global Disinformation Index—at center of lawsuit by Federalist+Daily Wire against State Department

9/10/2024, 8:46:37 PM

The statement addresses a public issue concerning the alleged partisan bias in the Global Disinformation Index (GDI) and its implications for media outlets. It critiques the perceived lack of outrage over the issue due to partisan biases and draws a comparison to a hypothetical scenario involving left-leaning media outlets. The tone is critical and suggests a double standard in public reactions to government actions based on political affiliations.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to highlight perceived injustices and biases, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for fairness. However, it could also be seen as potentially harmful by fostering division based on political lines. Overall, it partially adheres to this principle.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals by focusing on institutions and public figures rather than personal attacks. It adheres to this principle. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by bringing attention to an issue that the author believes is overlooked due to partisan biases. However, it could be more empathetic and compassionate in its tone. It partially adheres to this principle.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of perceived biases in public reactions and government actions. It does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques institutions and their actions. It adheres to this principle. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses its platform to bring attention to an issue the author believes is important for the betterment of society by advocating for fairness and accountability. It adheres to this principle. [+1]