Matt Taibbi

Rank 35 of 47
|
Score -49
9/10/2024, 8:46:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
491d
The Global Disinformation Index scandal uncovered by @gekaminsky has been overlooked because of partisan biases. If the Pentagon or State Department were paying agencies to downrank sites like Mother Jones or Salon, there would be widespread outrage.
Gabe Kaminsky
@gekaminsky
·
525d
New Heritage Foundation report shines light on @dcexaminer's series about the Global Disinformation Index—at center of lawsuit by Federalist+Daily Wire against State Department

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the role of agencies like NewsGuard and the Global Disinformation Index in potentially influencing public perception and media credibility. It raises concerns about bias and the suppression of dissenting viewpoints, which are significant public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but implies that certain agencies may be causing harm by downranking sites that deviate from official messaging. This could be seen as a call to scrutinize these agencies' actions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the actions of organizations rather than individuals. However, it implies that these organizations are engaging in biased practices, which could be seen as a form of criticism.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the importance of diverse viewpoints and the potential dangers of suppressing dissenting opinions. It encourages readers to consider the implications of biased information control.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the actions of organizations rather than attacking individuals. It calls for scrutiny and accountability, which are essential for healthy public discourse.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about potential biases in information control, which can contribute to the betterment of society by promoting transparency and accountability.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by advocating for the inclusion of diverse viewpoints and questioning the suppression of dissenting opinions. It uses its platform responsibly to address significant public issues.