Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant and contentious public issue, namely the actions of the Israeli government in Palestine and the international response to these actions. The tone is accusatory and urgent, calling for international sanctions against Israel for alleged violations of international law.
- The statement uses strong language ('ethnic cleansing,' 'genocide') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than fostering constructive dialogue. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others by labeling Israel as an 'Apartheid' state and accusing it of 'genocide,' which can be seen as a form of hate speech. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses highly charged language that may polarize opinions and hinder constructive dialogue. This violates the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes strong accusations without providing a platform for discussion or considering opposing viewpoints. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to call for sanctions, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by addressing perceived injustices. However, the inflammatory language undermines this goal. This partially aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society but is compromised by the tone.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity due to its inflammatory nature. This partially aligns with the principle of upholding free speech but fails to use the platform responsibly.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.