The statement appears to be part of a political discourse, likely referring to an election or political campaign. The tone suggests a confrontational stance against an organized entity, described as a 'machine,' rather than an individual candidate. The intent seems to be to rally support or awareness about the perceived opposition.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses combative language that could contribute to a polarized atmosphere. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on rallying opposition. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but frames the opposition as a 'machine,' which could dehumanize the opposing side. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to mobilize support against an organized entity, which can be seen as contributing to civic engagement. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political stance. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.