Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
أنس الشريف Anas Al-Sharif
@AnasAlSharif0
·
498d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the US's role in the Israel-Palestine conflict and the ethical implications of military support.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting anger or hostility. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a broad accusation of complicity which could be seen as disrespectful to those who hold different views. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it uses accusatory language that may polarize rather than unite. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a personal attack by accusing others of complicity in genocide without inviting discussion or understanding. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to call for action, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by addressing a serious issue. However, the accusatory tone may undermine this effort.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its inflammatory and accusatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.