Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -126

The statement is critical of the Biden-Harris administration's foreign policy, specifically accusing them of funding Israel's actions and interfering in peace talks between Ukraine and Russia. The tone is accusatory and the content addresses significant public issues related to international law and foreign policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language like 'genocidal war crimes,' which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of charged language could be seen as disrespectful to the individuals involved. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses accusatory language that may polarize rather than foster constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes strong accusations without providing a basis for discussion or understanding, and it could be seen as a personal attack on Biden and Harris. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to raise awareness about international issues, which could be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. However, the accusatory tone undermines this effort.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its inflammatory language. [-1]