The statement expresses frustration over a perceived unfairness in a debate setting, supported by data showing the time each candidate spent attacking their opponent. The tone is critical and suggests a bias by the moderator.
- The statement aims to highlight an issue of fairness, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for equal treatment. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize the moderator's actions, which could be seen as questioning their integrity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By presenting data, the statement attempts to promote understanding and empathy for the candidate who was denied a rebuttal. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a specific issue (denial of rebuttal) and supporting it with data, rather than making personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.