The statement and the linked content constitute public discourse as they engage with public issues, specifically the exclusion of Jill Stein from a political debate and her response to it. The tone is critical of the debate organizers and the major political campaigns, and it calls for public support and engagement.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the term 'sham' could be seen as inflammatory. Overall, it is a minor violation of this principle. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting the exclusion of a candidate and calling for support. It aligns well with this principle. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes the debate organizers and major campaigns but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a more inclusive political process, which aligns with the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to challenge the status quo responsibly and with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.