In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
126d
The statement and the accompanying image engage in public discourse by discussing the performance of a public figure in a debate and responding to a previous comment about the credibility of certain political figures. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, and it includes a claim supported by a poll result.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses confrontational language ('Are you kidding me? She destroyed him') which can be seen as aggressive and dismissive. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in a public debate with a dismissive tone and could be seen as contributing to a hostile environment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is focused on asserting dominance in a debate rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a confrontational tone and does not address the substance of the debate or the arguments made. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.