In reply to:
JSW
@jswondertwins
·
126d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
126d
The statement 'Should have given them to a library!' is a reply to a conversation that involves a public figure's commentary on socio-economic and political issues. The original conversation by @marwilliamson addresses significant public concerns such as economic inequality, healthcare, corporate power, and climate change. The subsequent replies, including the one in question, engage with this discourse, albeit in a more indirect manner.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It suggests a constructive alternative to throwing books away, which can be seen as a positive contribution. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting a charitable action (donating books to a library) instead of discarding them. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It offers a constructive suggestion without attacking the original poster. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.