The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the events of January 6th and the subsequent death of Brian Sicknick, and critiques a public figure's statement.
- The statement does not appear to strive to do no harm, as it uses strong language like 'truly shameful' and 'misleading, hair-splitting claim,' which could be seen as inflammatory and accusatory. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does call out a specific individual in a potentially harmful way. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing the individual rather than fostering a constructive dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and dialogue, as it includes personal attacks and does not provide a platform for discussion or resolution. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on criticizing another's statement. (0 points)Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it engages in personal attacks rather than constructive dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.