Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a serious public issue involving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and U.S. political figures, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is accusatory and politically charged, aiming to influence voting behavior.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses a tragic event to make a political point, which can be seen as insensitive and harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others; it uses the deaths of children to make a political argument, which can be seen as exploitative. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and divisive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a sweeping generalization and a political attack without engaging in a nuanced discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a specific political candidate, but it does so in a way that is divisive and potentially harmful. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it leverages a tragic event for political gain. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.