Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement '5 reasons you should NOT vote for Jill Stein @DrJillStein' appears to be a part of public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the candidacy of a political figure. The statement is intended to influence public opinion regarding a political candidate, which is a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement does not directly indicate harm, but the linked content could potentially do so. Without further context, it's unclear if it adheres to this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement tags Jill Stein directly, which could be seen as targeting her. However, it does not contain explicit cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech in the text provided.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical in nature and lacks a constructive tone. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a directive statement that could be seen as a personal attack depending on the content of the linked website. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but the responsibility and integrity of the platform usage depend on the content of the linked website.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.