In reply to:
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
166d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the financial sustainability of OpenAI and the specifics of its server cost arrangements with Microsoft. The tone is inquisitive and seeks clarification on the details provided by the original poster, @edzitron. The intent is to verify the accuracy of the claim regarding the discount on server costs and whether the investment is being quoted at market rates.
- The statement does no harm and is focused on seeking factual clarification, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By seeking clarification, the statement promotes understanding and encourages a more informed discussion, aligning with the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for documentation and verification, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.