Gary Marcus

The statement 'x’s verification system is so messed up I am concerned this may not be legit. Would appreciate any info either way.' constitutes public discourse as it addresses concerns about the integrity of a social media platform's verification system, which is a public issue. The statement is a response to a conversation involving derogatory remarks and potentially harmful content, which further emphasizes the importance of verification and content moderation on social media platforms.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses concern about the potential for harm due to a flawed verification system.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It seeks information rather than making accusations. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification and information about the legitimacy of the account in question. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for information and not engaging in personal attacks. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses the platform responsibly by raising a legitimate concern about the verification system, which can impact the betterment of society by promoting accountability and transparency. [+1]