In reply to:
The Robust Opposition - FREE PALESTINE
@Lauren_Steiner
·
126d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
126d
The statement engages in a discussion about political strategy and the implications of voting patterns, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is critical and analytical, focusing on the actions and motivations of political figures and movements.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is critical of political strategies and figures, which could be seen as indirectly harmful if not done constructively.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make an accusation about someone's motivations, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on critique. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, though it does imply ulterior motives. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in political discourse responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.