The statement addresses a public issue by highlighting the allocation of taxpayer money towards the legal defense of a former governor accused of sexual harassment, while contrasting it with the issue of child hunger in New York. The tone is critical and aims to provoke thought about the priorities in public spending.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as inflammatory by those who support the former governor. However, it raises a legitimate concern about public resource allocation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the issue rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting the plight of hungry children, though it does so in a critical manner.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of public spending priorities but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the actions rather than the individuals involved.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to draw attention to societal issues, specifically the allocation of public funds and child hunger.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to raise awareness about public spending and social issues.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.